Table 1:
Folate supplement use (categorical)
|
Notes |
These reports examine any use of supplements that contain folate in relation to AD risk. Information on supplement intake was collected using food frequency questionnaires.
|
|
|
Alzheimer Disease |
Total Dementia |
|
Paper |
Cohort |
Study Type |
# Subjects
(% Female) |
Average Follow-up Time |
Exposure Distribution
|
# of Cases |
Effect Size |
95% CI |
P-value |
# of Cases |
Effect Size |
95% CI |
P-value |
Ethnicity |
Age at Start of Follow-up:
Mean (SD) (Range) |
Diagnostic Assessment |
Covariates & Analysis |
Comment |
Paper |
Luchsinger, 2007
|
WHICAP
|
Incidence study reporting hazard ratios (HRs) |
965
(70%) |
6.1 y |
No: Yes: (detail) |
- - Total: 192 |
1.00 1.00 |
Ref. 0.70-1.40 |
Ref. 0.99 * |
|
|
|
|
Caucasian, Hispanic, African-American (Black) (detail) |
76
(6)
(65
-
) |
AD Diagnosis: DSM IV, NINCDS ADRDA (detail) |
A, E, G, APOE4, CHD, DM, HTN, SM, SH, VTB, VTB6‡ (detail) |
|
Luchsinger, 2007
|
Luchsinger, 2007
|
WHICAP
|
Incidence study reporting hazard ratios (HRs) |
965
(70%) |
6.1 y |
<400μg/day: ≥400μg/day: (detail) |
- - Total: 192 |
1.00 0.70 |
Ref. 0.50-1.20 |
Ref. 0.11 * |
|
|
|
|
Caucasian, Hispanic, African-American (Black) (detail) |
76
(6)
(65
-
) |
AD Diagnosis: DSM IV, NINCDS ADRDA (detail) |
A, E, G, APOE4, CHD, DM, HTN, SM, SH, VTB, VTB6‡ (detail) |
|
Luchsinger, 2007
|
Nelson, 2009
|
Cache County Study
|
Incidence study reporting hazard ratios (HRs) |
3634
(57%) |
9.0 y |
<400μg/day: ≥400μg/day: (detail) |
- - Total: 212 |
1.00 1.13 |
Ref. 0.69-1.87 |
Ref. 0.63 * |
- - Total: 353 |
1.00 1.14 |
Ref. 0.75-1.74 |
Ref. 0.54 * |
Caucasian (detail) |
75
(-)
(65
-
) |
Screening: 3MSE
AD Diagnosis: NINCDS ADRDA (detail) |
A, E, G, ALC, APOE4, BMI, Kcal, DM, MI, PA, SM, SH, VTB, VTB6‡ (detail) |
|
Nelson, 2009
|
* Derived value.
‡ Covariates: "A" (age), "E" (education), "G" (gender), "ALC" (alcohol intake), "APOE4" (APOE e4 genotype), "BMI" (body mass index), "Kcal" (caloric intake), "CHD" (coronary heart disease), "DM" (diabetes mellitus), "HTN" (hypertension), "MI" (mycardial infarction history), "PA" (physical activity), "SM" (smoking status), "SH" (stroke history), "VTB" (vitamin B12), "VTB6" (vitamin B6)
|
|
Table 2:
Vitamin B6 supplement use (categorical)
|
Notes |
These reports examine any use of supplements that contain vitamin B6 in relation to AD risk. Information on supplement intake was collected using food frequency questionnaires.
|
|
|
Alzheimer Disease |
Total Dementia |
|
Paper |
Cohort |
Study Type |
# Subjects
(% Female) |
Average Follow-up Time |
Exposure Distribution
|
# of Cases |
Effect Size |
95% CI |
P-value |
# of Cases |
Effect Size |
95% CI |
P-value |
Ethnicity |
Age at Start of Follow-up:
Mean (SD) (Range) |
Diagnostic Assessment |
Covariates & Analysis |
Comment |
Paper |
Nelson, 2009
|
Cache County Study
|
Incidence study reporting hazard ratios (HRs) |
3634
(57%) |
9.0 y |
<2 mg/day: ≥2 mg/day: (detail) |
- - Total: 212 |
1.00 0.84 |
Ref. 0.53-1.35 |
Ref. 0.46 * |
- - Total: 353 |
1.00 0.95 |
Ref. 0.62-1.46 |
Ref. 0.81 * |
Caucasian (detail) |
75
(-)
(65
-
) |
Screening: 3MSE
AD Diagnosis: NINCDS ADRDA (detail) |
A, E, G, ALC, APOE4, BMI, Kcal, DM, MI, PA, SM, SH, FOLTOTL, VTB‡§ (detail) |
|
Nelson, 2009
|
* Derived value.
‡ Covariates: "A" (age), "E" (education), "G" (gender), "ALC" (alcohol intake), "APOE4" (APOE e4 genotype), "BMI" (body mass index), "Kcal" (caloric intake), "DM" (diabetes mellitus), "MI" (mycardial infarction history), "PA" (physical activity), "SM" (smoking status), "SH" (stroke history), "FOLTOTL" (total folate), "VTB" (vitamin B12)
§ Covariates for total dementia are different.
|
|
* Derived value.
† Five or fewer cases exist.
‡ Covariates: "A" (age), "E" (education), "G" (gender), "APOE4" (APOE e4 genotype), "HS" (health status)
|
|
Table 4:
Dietary folate intake (categorical)
|
Notes |
These studies evaluated folate intake from diet in relation to AD risk. The studies measured dietary intake of folate using food frequency questionnaires.
|
|
|
Alzheimer Disease |
Total Dementia |
|
Paper |
Cohort |
Study Type |
# Subjects
(% Female) |
Average Follow-up Time |
Exposure Distribution
|
# of Cases |
Effect Size |
95% CI |
P-value |
# of Cases |
Effect Size |
95% CI |
P-value |
Ethnicity |
Age at Start of Follow-up:
Mean (SD) (Range) |
Diagnostic Assessment |
Covariates & Analysis |
Comment |
Paper |
Luchsinger, 2007
|
WHICAP
|
Incidence study reporting hazard ratios (HRs) |
965
(70%) |
6.1 y |
Lowest quartile: 25% Highest quartile: 25% (detail) |
- - Total: 192 |
1.00 0.80 |
Ref. 0.50-1.20 |
Ref. 0.32 * |
|
|
|
|
Caucasian, Hispanic, African-American (Black) (detail) |
76
(6)
(65
-
) |
AD Diagnosis: DSM IV, NINCDS ADRDA (detail) |
A, E, G, APOE4, CHD, DM, HTN, SM, SH, VTB, VTB6‡ (detail) |
|
Luchsinger, 2007
|
Morris, 2006
|
CHAP
|
Cohort study reporting odds ratios (ORs) |
1041
(62%) |
3.9 y |
Lowest quintile (median: 184.0 µg/day): 20% Second quintile (median: 240.2 µg/day): 20% Third quintile (median: 279.6 µg/day): 20% Fourth quintile (median: 330.3 µg/day): 20% Highest quintile (median: 405.2 µg/day): 20% (detail) |
- - - - - Total: 161 |
1.00 1.70 0.90 1.50 1.80 |
Ref. 0.70-4.10 0.40-2.40 0.60-3.50 0.80-4.10 |
Ref. 0.24 0.82 0.37 0.16 * |
|
|
|
|
Caucasian, African-American (Black) (detail) |
73
(-)
(65
-
) |
Screening: CERAD
AD Diagnosis: NINCDS ADRDA (detail) |
A, E, G, APOE4, VITED, FUT, CA-Past, RE, NCNTOTL‡ (detail) |
|
Morris, 2006
|
Nelson, 2009
|
Cache County Study
|
Incidence study reporting hazard ratios (HRs) |
3634
(57%) |
9.0 y |
Lowest quintile: 20% Second quintile: 20% Third quintile: 20% Fourth quintile: 20% Highest quintile: 20% (detail) |
- - - - - Total: 212 |
1.00 0.76 1.10 1.16 1.02 |
Ref. 0.46-1.27 0.69-1.75 0.72-1.86 0.62-1.67 |
Ref. 0.29 0.69 0.54 0.94 * |
- - - - - Total: 353 |
1.00 0.63 0.97 0.99 0.86 |
Ref. 0.40-1.01 0.64-1.47 0.64-1.51 0.55-1.35 |
Ref. 0.05 0.89 0.96 0.51 * |
Caucasian (detail) |
75
(-)
(65
-
) |
Screening: 3MSE
AD Diagnosis: NINCDS ADRDA (detail) |
A, E, G, ALC, APOE4, BMI, Kcal, DM, MI, PA, SM, SH, VTB, VTB6‡ (detail) |
|
Nelson, 2009
|
* Derived value.
‡ Covariates: "A" (age), "E" (education), "G" (gender), "ALC" (alcohol intake), "APOE4" (APOE e4 genotype), "BMI" (body mass index), "Kcal" (caloric intake), "CHD" (coronary heart disease), "DM" (diabetes mellitus), "VITED" (dietary vitamin E), "FUT" (follow up time), "HTN" (hypertension), "MI" (mycardial infarction history), "CA-Past" (Past Cognitive Activity ), "PA" (physical activity), "RE" (race/ethnicity), "SM" (smoking status), "SH" (stroke history), "NCNTOTL" (total niacin), "VTB" (vitamin B12), "VTB6" (vitamin B6)
|
|
Table 5:
Dietary vitamin B6 intake (categorical)
|
Notes |
These studies evaluated vitamin B6 intake from diet in relation to AD risk. The studies measured dietary intake of vitamin B6 using food frequency questionnaires.
|
|
|
Alzheimer Disease |
Total Dementia |
|
Paper |
Cohort |
Study Type |
# Subjects
(% Female) |
Average Follow-up Time |
Exposure Distribution
|
# of Cases |
Effect Size |
95% CI |
P-value |
# of Cases |
Effect Size |
95% CI |
P-value |
Ethnicity |
Age at Start of Follow-up:
Mean (SD) (Range) |
Diagnostic Assessment |
Covariates & Analysis |
Comment |
Paper |
Morris, 2006
|
CHAP
|
Cohort study reporting odds ratios (ORs) |
1041
(62%) |
3.9 y |
Lowest quintile (median: 1.2 mg/day): 20% Second quintile (median: 1.4 mg/day): 20% Third quintile (median: 1.6 mg/day): 20% Fourth quintile (median: 1.9 mg/day): 20% Highest quintile (median: 2.2 mg/day): 20% (detail) |
- - - - - Total: 161 |
1.00 0.70 1.60 1.00 0.70 |
Ref. 0.30-1.70 0.80-3.40 0.40-2.30 0.30-1.40 |
Ref. 0.42 0.2 0.99 0.36 * |
|
|
|
|
Caucasian, African-American (Black) (detail) |
73
(-)
(65
-
) |
Screening: CERAD
AD Diagnosis: NINCDS ADRDA (detail) |
A, E, G, APOE4, VITED, FUT, CA-Past, RE, NCNTOTL‡ (detail) |
|
Morris, 2006
|
Nelson, 2009
|
Cache County Study
|
Incidence study reporting hazard ratios (HRs) |
3634
(57%) |
9.0 y |
Lowest quintile: 20% Second quintile: 20% Third quintile: 20% Fourth quintile: 20% Highest quintile: 20% (detail) |
- - - - - |
1.00 0.78 1.06 0.91 0.84 |
Ref. 0.47-1.28 0.67-1.68 0.57-1.45 0.53-1.35 |
Ref. 0.33 0.8 0.69 0.46 * |
- - - - - |
1.00 - 1.06 0.82 0.80 |
Ref. 0.50-1.24 0.70-1.61 0.53-1.28 0.51-1.23 |
Ref. 0.31 0.78 0.38 0.32 * |
Caucasian (detail) |
75
(-)
(65
-
) |
Screening: 3MSE
AD Diagnosis: NINCDS ADRDA (detail) |
A, E, G, ALC, APOE4, BMI, Kcal, DM, MI, PA, SM, SH, FOLTOTL, VTB‡ (detail) |
|
Nelson, 2009
|
* Derived value.
‡ Covariates: "A" (age), "E" (education), "G" (gender), "ALC" (alcohol intake), "APOE4" (APOE e4 genotype), "BMI" (body mass index), "Kcal" (caloric intake), "DM" (diabetes mellitus), "VITED" (dietary vitamin E), "FUT" (follow up time), "MI" (mycardial infarction history), "CA-Past" (Past Cognitive Activity ), "PA" (physical activity), "RE" (race/ethnicity), "SM" (smoking status), "SH" (stroke history), "FOLTOTL" (total folate), "NCNTOTL" (total niacin), "VTB" (vitamin B12)
|
|
Table 6:
Dietary vitamin B12 intake (categorical)
|
Notes |
These studies evaluated vitamin B12 intake from diet in relation to AD risk. The studies measured dietary intake of vitamin B12 using food frequency questionnaires.
|
|
|
Alzheimer Disease |
Total Dementia |
|
Paper |
Cohort |
Study Type |
# Subjects
(% Female) |
Average Follow-up Time |
Exposure Distribution
|
# of Cases |
Effect Size |
95% CI |
P-value |
# of Cases |
Effect Size |
95% CI |
P-value |
Ethnicity |
Age at Start of Follow-up:
Mean (SD) (Range) |
Diagnostic Assessment |
Covariates & Analysis |
Comment |
Paper |
Morris, 2006
|
CHAP
|
Cohort study reporting odds ratios (ORs) |
1041
(62%) |
3.9 y |
Lowest quintile (median: 2.5 μg/day): 20% Second quintile (median: 4.2 μg/day): 20% Third quintile (median: 5.6 μg/day): 20% Fourth quintile (median: 7.7 μg/day): 20% Highest quintile (median: 14.0 μg/day): 20% (detail) |
- - - - - Total: 161 |
1.00 1.40 0.80 1.50 1.00 |
Ref. 0.70-2.70 0.30-2.30 0.60-4.00 - |
Ref. 0.33 0.67 0.4 0.99 * |
|
|
|
|
Caucasian, African-American (Black) (detail) |
73
(-)
(65
-
) |
Screening: CERAD
AD Diagnosis: NINCDS ADRDA (detail) |
A, E, G, APOE4, VITED, FUT, CA-Past, RE, NCNTOTL‡ (detail) |
|
Morris, 2006
|
Nelson, 2009
|
Cache County Study
|
Incidence study reporting hazard ratios (HRs) |
3634
(57%) |
9.0 y |
Lowest quintile: 20% Second quintile: 20% Third quintile: 20% Fourth quintile: 20% Highest quintile: 20% (detail) |
- - - - - Total: 212 |
1.00 1.08 0.83 1.46 0.95 |
Ref. 0.67-1.76 0.49-1.40 0.91-2.33 0.61-1.49 |
Ref. 0.75 0.49 0.11 0.82 * |
- - - - - Total: 353 |
1.00 1.08 0.84 1.30 0.90 |
Ref. 0.73-1.75 0.52-1.36 0.84-2.01 0.60-1.37 |
Ref. 0.58 0.48 0.24 0.62 * |
Caucasian (detail) |
75
(-)
(65
-
) |
Screening: 3MSE
AD Diagnosis: NINCDS ADRDA (detail) |
A, E, G, ALC, APOE4, BMI, Kcal, DM, MI, PA, SM, SH, FOLTOTL, VTB6‡ (detail) |
|
Nelson, 2009
|
* Derived value.
‡ Covariates: "A" (age), "E" (education), "G" (gender), "ALC" (alcohol intake), "APOE4" (APOE e4 genotype), "BMI" (body mass index), "Kcal" (caloric intake), "DM" (diabetes mellitus), "VITED" (dietary vitamin E), "FUT" (follow up time), "MI" (mycardial infarction history), "CA-Past" (Past Cognitive Activity ), "PA" (physical activity), "RE" (race/ethnicity), "SM" (smoking status), "SH" (stroke history), "FOLTOTL" (total folate), "NCNTOTL" (total niacin), "VTB6" (vitamin B6)
|
|
Table 7:
Total folate intake (categorical)
|
Notes |
These studies evaluated the association between total folate intake (dietary plus supplemental) and risk of Alzheimer disease. The majority of studies measured intake of folate using food frequency questionnaires. One study used a a 7-day food diary.
|
|
|
Alzheimer Disease |
Total Dementia |
|
Paper |
Cohort |
Study Type |
# Subjects
(% Female) |
Average Follow-up Time |
Exposure Distribution
|
# of Cases |
Effect Size |
95% CI |
P-value |
# of Cases |
Effect Size |
95% CI |
P-value |
Ethnicity |
Age at Start of Follow-up:
Mean (SD) (Range) |
Diagnostic Assessment |
Covariates & Analysis |
Comment |
Paper |
Corrada, 2005
|
BLSA
|
Incidence study reporting hazard ratios (HRs) |
579
(38%) |
9.3 y |
Lowest tertile (median: 200.0 µg/day): 33% Second tertile (median: 317.8 µg/day): 33% Highest tertile (median: 627.8 µg/day): 33% (detail) |
21 21 15 Total: 57 |
1.00 0.98 0.32 |
Ref. 0.48-2.01 0.11-0.92 |
Ref. 0.96 0.03 |
|
|
|
|
(detail) |
70
(-)
(49
-
93) |
AD Diagnosis: NINCDS ADRDA (detail) |
A, E, G, Kcal, VTB6, VitE‡ (detail) |
|
Corrada, 2005
|
Corrada, 2005
|
BLSA
|
Incidence study reporting hazard ratios (HRs) |
579
(38%) |
9.3 y |
79.0-398.9 µg/day: 65% 403.1–1,457.0 µg/day: 35% (detail) |
42 15 Total: 57 |
1.00 0.45 |
Ref. 0.21-0.97 |
Ref. 0.04 |
|
|
|
|
(detail) |
70
(-)
(49
-
93) |
AD Diagnosis: NINCDS ADRDA (detail) |
A, E, G, Kcal, VTB6, VitE‡ (detail) |
|
Corrada, 2005
|
Luchsinger, 2007
|
WHICAP
|
Incidence study reporting hazard ratios (HRs) |
965
(70%) |
6.1 y |
Lowest quartile (≤292.9 µg/day): 25% Second quartile (293.0-365.0 µg/day): 25% Third quartile (365.1-487.8 µg/day): 25% Highest quartile (≥487.9 µg/day): 25% (detail) |
- - - - Total: 192 |
1.00 0.90 0.70 0.50 |
Ref. 0.60-1.30 0.50-1.10 0.30-0.90 |
Ref. 0.59 0.08 0.01 * |
|
|
|
|
Caucasian, Hispanic, African-American (Black) (detail) |
76
(6)
(65
-
) |
AD Diagnosis: DSM IV, NINCDS ADRDA (detail) |
A, E, G, APOE4, CHD, DM, HTN, SM, SH, VTB, VTB6‡ (detail) |
|
Luchsinger, 2007
|
Morris, 2006
|
CHAP
|
Cohort study reporting odds ratios (ORs) |
1041
(62%) |
3.9 y |
Lowest quintile (median: 202.8 µg/day): 20% Second quintile (median: 275.2 µg/day): 20% Third quintile (median: 338.2 µg/day): 20% Fourth quintile (median: 474.5 µg/day): 20% Highest quintile (median: 752.7 µg/day): 20% (detail) |
- - - - - Total: 161 |
1.00 1.00 1.90 2.70 1.60 |
Ref. 0.40-2.30 0.70-5.00 1.00-7.10 0.50-5.20 |
Ref. 0.99 0.2 0.05 0.43 * |
|
|
|
|
Caucasian, African-American (Black) (detail) |
73
(-)
(65
-
) |
Screening: CERAD
AD Diagnosis: NINCDS ADRDA (detail) |
A, E, G, APOE4, VITED, FUT, CA-Past, RE, NCNTOTL‡ (detail) |
|
Morris, 2006
|
Nelson, 2009
|
Cache County Study
|
Incidence study reporting hazard ratios (HRs) |
3634
(57%) |
9.0 y |
Lowest quintile (mean: 333 μg/day): 20% Second quintile (mean: 430 μg/day): 20% Third quintile (mean: 476 μg/day): 20% Fourth quintile (mean: 524 μg/day): 20% Highest quintile (mean: 698 μg/day): 20% (detail) |
- - - - - Total: 212 |
1.00 1.14 0.95 1.36 1.75 |
Ref. 0.71-1.84 0.54-1.66 0.68-2.72 0.80-3.83 |
Ref. 0.59 0.86 0.38 0.16 * |
- - - - - Total: 353 |
1.00 1.02 0.87 1.13 1.42 |
Ref. 0.67-1.57 0.53-1.45 0.60-2.12 0.69-2.88 |
Ref. 0.96 0.59 0.7 0.34 * |
Caucasian (detail) |
75
(-)
(65
-
) |
Screening: 3MSE
AD Diagnosis: NINCDS ADRDA (detail) |
A, E, G, ALC, APOE4, BMI, Kcal, DM, MI, PA, SM, SH, VTB, VTB6‡ (detail) |
|
Nelson, 2009
|
* Derived value.
‡ Covariates: "A" (age), "E" (education), "G" (gender), "ALC" (alcohol intake), "APOE4" (APOE e4 genotype), "BMI" (body mass index), "Kcal" (caloric intake), "CHD" (coronary heart disease), "DM" (diabetes mellitus), "VITED" (dietary vitamin E), "FUT" (follow up time), "HTN" (hypertension), "MI" (mycardial infarction history), "CA-Past" (Past Cognitive Activity ), "PA" (physical activity), "RE" (race/ethnicity), "SM" (smoking status), "SH" (stroke history), "NCNTOTL" (total niacin), "VTB" (vitamin B12), "VTB6" (vitamin B6), "VitE" (vitamin E)
|
|
Table 8:
Total vitamin B6 intake (categorical)
|
Notes |
These studies evaluated the association between total vitamin B6 intake (dietary plus supplemental) and risk of Alzheimer disease. The majority of studies measured intake of vitamin B6 using food frequency questionnaires. One study used a a 7-day food diary.
|
|
|
Alzheimer Disease |
Total Dementia |
|
Paper |
Cohort |
Study Type |
# Subjects
(% Female) |
Average Follow-up Time |
Exposure Distribution
|
# of Cases |
Effect Size |
95% CI |
P-value |
# of Cases |
Effect Size |
95% CI |
P-value |
Ethnicity |
Age at Start of Follow-up:
Mean (SD) (Range) |
Diagnostic Assessment |
Covariates & Analysis |
Comment |
Paper |
Corrada, 2005
|
BLSA
|
Incidence study reporting hazard ratios (HRs) |
579
(38%) |
9.3 y |
Lowest tertile (median: 1.4 mg/day): 33% Second tertile (median: 2.2 mg/day): 33% Highest tertile (median: 4.9 mg/day): 33% (detail) |
20 18 19 Total: 57 |
1.00 0.80 2.02 |
Ref. 0.37-1.71 0.78-5.26 |
Ref. 0.56 0.15 |
|
|
|
|
(detail) |
70
(-)
(49
-
93) |
AD Diagnosis: NINCDS ADRDA (detail) |
A, E, G, Kcal, FOLTOTL, VitE‡ (detail) |
|
Corrada, 2005
|
Corrada, 2005
|
BLSA
|
Incidence study reporting hazard ratios (HRs) |
579
(38%) |
9.3 y |
0.5-1.3 mg/day: 12% 1.3-254.6 mg/day: 88% (detail) |
10 47 Total: 57 |
1.00 0.55 |
Ref. 0.26-1.15 |
Ref. 0.11 |
|
|
|
|
(detail) |
70
(-)
(49
-
93) |
AD Diagnosis: NINCDS ADRDA (detail) |
A, E, G, Kcal, FOLTOTL, VitE‡ (detail) |
|
Corrada, 2005
|
Luchsinger, 2007
|
WHICAP
|
Incidence study reporting hazard ratios (HRs) |
965
(70%) |
6.1 y |
Lowest quartile (<2.3 mg/day): 25% Second quartile (2.3-2.7 mg/day): 25% Third quartile (2.8-4.5 mg/day): 25% Highest quartile (>4.5 mg/day): 25% (detail) |
- - - - Total: 192 |
1.00 1.10 1.30 1.30 |
Ref. 0.70-1.70 0.80-2.10 0.70-2.30 |
Ref. 0.67 0.29 0.39 * |
|
|
|
|
Caucasian, Hispanic, African-American (Black) (detail) |
76
(6)
(65
-
) |
AD Diagnosis: DSM IV, NINCDS ADRDA (detail) |
A, E, G, APOE4, CHD, DM, HTN, SM, SH, FOLTOTL, VTB‡ (detail) |
|
Luchsinger, 2007
|
Morris, 2006
|
CHAP
|
Cohort study reporting odds ratios (ORs) |
1041
(62%) |
3.9 y |
Lowest quintile (median: 1.2 mg/day): 20% Second quintile (median: 1.6 mg/day): 20% Third quintile (median: 1.9 mg/day): 20% Fourth quintile (median: 3.1 mg/day): 20% Highest quintile (median: 5.5 mg/day): 20% (detail) |
- - - - - Total: 161 |
1.00 0.90 1.30 1.90 0.70 |
Ref. 0.40-2.10 0.60-3.10 0.70-5.10 0.20-2.40 |
Ref. 0.8 0.53 0.21 0.57 * |
|
|
|
|
Caucasian, African-American (Black) (detail) |
73
(-)
(65
-
) |
Screening: CERAD
AD Diagnosis: NINCDS ADRDA (detail) |
A, E, G, APOE4, VITED, FUT, CA-Past, RE, NCNTOTL‡ (detail) |
|
Morris, 2006
|
Nelson, 2009
|
Cache County Study
|
Incidence study reporting hazard ratios (HRs) |
3634
(57%) |
9.0 y |
Lowest quintile (mean: 1.57 μg/day): 20% Second quintile (mean: 2.16 μg/day): 20% Third quintile (mean: 2.96 μg/day): 20% Fourth quintile (mean: 4.24 μg/day): 20% Highest quintile (mean: 25.8 μg/day): 20% (detail) |
- - - - - Total: 212 |
1.00 0.79 0.62 0.61 0.58 |
Ref. 0.49-1.27 0.36-1.07 0.30-1.27 0.27-1.21 |
Ref. 0.33 0.09 0.37 0.15 * |
- - - - - Total: 353 |
1.00 0.74 0.62 0.69 0.67 |
Ref. 0.48-1.14 0.38-1.03 0.36-1.34 0.34-1.30 |
Ref. 0.17 0.06 0.27 0.24 * |
Caucasian (detail) |
75
(-)
(65
-
) |
Screening: 3MSE
AD Diagnosis: NINCDS ADRDA (detail) |
A, E, G, ALC, APOE4, BMI, Kcal, DM, MI, PA, SM, SH, FOLTOTL, VTB‡ (detail) |
|
Nelson, 2009
|
* Derived value.
‡ Covariates: "A" (age), "E" (education), "G" (gender), "ALC" (alcohol intake), "APOE4" (APOE e4 genotype), "BMI" (body mass index), "Kcal" (caloric intake), "CHD" (coronary heart disease), "DM" (diabetes mellitus), "VITED" (dietary vitamin E), "FUT" (follow up time), "HTN" (hypertension), "MI" (mycardial infarction history), "CA-Past" (Past Cognitive Activity ), "PA" (physical activity), "RE" (race/ethnicity), "SM" (smoking status), "SH" (stroke history), "FOLTOTL" (total folate), "NCNTOTL" (total niacin), "VTB" (vitamin B12), "VitE" (vitamin E)
|
|
Table 9:
Total vitamin B12 intake (categorical)
|
Notes |
These studies evaluated the association between total vitamin B12 intake (dietary plus supplemental) and risk of Alzheimer disease. The majority of studies measured intake of vitamin B12 using food frequency questionnaires. One study used a a 7-day food diary.
|
|
|
Alzheimer Disease |
Total Dementia |
|
Paper |
Cohort |
Study Type |
# Subjects
(% Female) |
Average Follow-up Time |
Exposure Distribution
|
# of Cases |
Effect Size |
95% CI |
P-value |
# of Cases |
Effect Size |
95% CI |
P-value |
Ethnicity |
Age at Start of Follow-up:
Mean (SD) (Range) |
Diagnostic Assessment |
Covariates & Analysis |
Comment |
Paper |
Corrada, 2005
|
BLSA
|
Incidence study reporting hazard ratios (HRs) |
579
(38%) |
9.3 y |
Lowest tertile (median: 3.2 μg/day): 33% Second tertile (median: 6.3 μg/day): 33% Highest tertile (median: 15.4 μg/day): 33% (detail) |
20 16 21 Total: 57 |
1.00 0.80 0.84 |
Ref. 0.41-1.59 0.45-1.59 |
Ref. 0.53 0.6 |
|
|
|
|
(detail) |
70
(-)
(49
-
93) |
AD Diagnosis: NINCDS ADRDA (detail) |
A, E, G, Kcal‡ (detail) |
|
Corrada, 2005
|
Corrada, 2005
|
BLSA
|
Incidence study reporting hazard ratios (HRs) |
579
(38%) |
9.3 y |
0.2-2.4 μg/day: 8% 2.4-314.8 μg/day: 92% (detail) |
7 50 Total: 57 |
1.00 0.60 |
Ref. 0.26-1.36 |
Ref. 0.22 |
|
|
|
|
(detail) |
70
(-)
(49
-
93) |
AD Diagnosis: NINCDS ADRDA (detail) |
A, E, G, Kcal‡ (detail) |
|
Corrada, 2005
|
Luchsinger, 2007
|
WHICAP
|
Incidence study reporting hazard ratios (HRs) |
965
(70%) |
6.1 y |
Lowest quartile <3.5 μg/day): 25% Second quartile (3.5-6.6 μg/day): 25% Third quartile (6.7-13.5 μg/day): 25% Highest quartile (>13.5 μg/day): 25% (detail) |
- - - - Total: 192 |
1.00 0.70 1.20 1.10 |
Ref. 0.40-1.00 0.80-1.90 0.70-1.70 |
Ref. 0.13 0.41 0.67 * |
|
|
|
|
Caucasian, Hispanic, African-American (Black) (detail) |
76
(6)
(65
-
) |
AD Diagnosis: DSM IV, NINCDS ADRDA (detail) |
A, E, G, APOE4, CHD, DM, HTN, SM, SH, FOLTOTL, VTB6‡ (detail) |
|
Luchsinger, 2007
|
Morris, 2006
|
CHAP
|
Cohort study reporting odds ratios (ORs) |
1041
(62%) |
3.9 y |
Lowest quintile (median: 3.1 μg/day): 20% Second quintile (median: 5.3 μg/day): 20% Third quintile (median: 7.8 μg/day): 20% Fourth quintile (median: 12.7 μg/day): 20% Highest quintile (median: 20.6 μg/day): 20% (detail) |
- - - - - Total: 161 |
1.00 1.00 0.60 1.70 0.60 |
Ref. 0.40-2.70 0.30-1.50 0.70-4.40 0.20-1.60 |
Ref. 0.99 0.21 0.26 0.34 * |
|
|
|
|
Caucasian, African-American (Black) (detail) |
73
(-)
(65
-
) |
Screening: CERAD
AD Diagnosis: NINCDS ADRDA (detail) |
A, E, G, APOE4, VITED, FUT, CA-Past, RE, NCNTOTL‡ (detail) |
|
Morris, 2006
|
Nelson, 2009
|
Cache County Study
|
Incidence study reporting hazard ratios (HRs) |
3634
(57%) |
9.0 y |
Lowest quintile (mean: 3.4 μg/day): 20% Second quintile (mean: 5.5 μg/day): 20% Third quintile (mean: 8.1 μg/day): 20% Fourth quintile (mean: 11.1 μg/day): 20% Highest quintile (mean: 20.1 μg/day): 20% (detail) |
- - - - - Total: 212 |
1.00 0.95 1.14 0.87 0.91 |
Ref. 0.58-1.54 0.71-1.81 0.50-1.53 0.52-1.60 |
Ref. 0.84 0.58 0.63 0.74 * |
- - - - - Total: 353 |
1.00 0.93 1.14 0.83 0.87 |
Ref. 0.60-1.46 0.74-1.74 0.49-1.39 0.52-1.46 |
Ref. 0.75 0.55 0.48 0.63 * |
Caucasian (detail) |
75
(-)
(65
-
) |
Screening: 3MSE
AD Diagnosis: NINCDS ADRDA (detail) |
A, E, G, ALC, APOE4, BMI, Kcal, DM, MI, PA, SM, SH, FOLTOTL, VTB6‡ (detail) |
|
Nelson, 2009
|
* Derived value.
‡ Covariates: "A" (age), "E" (education), "G" (gender), "ALC" (alcohol intake), "APOE4" (APOE e4 genotype), "BMI" (body mass index), "Kcal" (caloric intake), "CHD" (coronary heart disease), "DM" (diabetes mellitus), "VITED" (dietary vitamin E), "FUT" (follow up time), "HTN" (hypertension), "MI" (mycardial infarction history), "CA-Past" (Past Cognitive Activity ), "PA" (physical activity), "RE" (race/ethnicity), "SM" (smoking status), "SH" (stroke history), "FOLTOTL" (total folate), "NCNTOTL" (total niacin), "VTB6" (vitamin B6)
|
|
Table 10:
Serum folate (categorical)
|
Notes |
These studies evaluated serum folate concentrations in relation to AD risk.
|
|
|
Alzheimer Disease |
Total Dementia |
|
Paper |
Cohort |
Study Type |
# Subjects
(% Female) |
Average Follow-up Time |
Exposure Distribution
|
# of Cases |
Effect Size |
95% CI |
P-value |
# of Cases |
Effect Size |
95% CI |
P-value |
Ethnicity |
Age at Start of Follow-up:
Mean (SD) (Range) |
Diagnostic Assessment |
Covariates & Analysis |
Comment |
Paper |
Middleton, 2007
|
CSHA
|
Cohort study reporting odds ratios (ORs) |
318
(63%) |
5.0 y |
Below median: 50% Above median: 50% |
- - Total: 45 |
1.91 1.00 |
0.89-4.11 Ref. |
0.1 Ref. * |
- - Total: 62 |
1.62 1.00 |
0.84-3.15 Ref. |
0.15 Ref. * |
(detail) |
79
(-)
(65
-
) |
Screening: 3MSE
AD Diagnosis: DSM IIIR (detail) |
A, E, G, PA, VARS, VTB‡ |
|
Middleton, 2007
|
Ravaglia, 2005
|
CSBA
|
Incidence study reporting hazard ratios (HRs) |
816
(53%) |
3.8 y |
Lowest quartile (<8.9 nmol/L): 25% Second quartile (8.9-11.8 nmol/L): 25% Third quartile (11.9-15.2 nmol/L): 25% Highest quartile (>15.2 nmol/L): 25% (detail) |
- - - - Total: 70 |
2.04 1.30 0.66 1.00 |
1.02-4.09 0.62-2.72 0.29-1.54 Ref. |
0.05 0.48 0.34 Ref. |
- - - - Total: 112 |
2.22 1.83 1.16 1.00 |
1.21-4.05 1.00-3.34 0.60-2.24 Ref. |
0.01 0.05 0.66 Ref. |
Caucasian (detail) |
74
(6)
(65
-
) |
Screening: MMSE
AD Diagnosis: DSM IV, NINCDS ADRDA (detail) |
A, E, G, APOE4, HCY, CRT, SH, VTB‡ |
|
Ravaglia, 2005
|
Ravaglia, 2005
|
CSBA
|
Incidence study reporting hazard ratios (HRs) |
816
(53%) |
3.8 y |
Below median (≤11.8 nmol/L): 50% Above median (>11.8 nmol/L): 50% (detail) |
- - Total: 70 |
1.98 1.00 |
1.15-3.40 Ref. |
0.01 Ref. |
- - Total: 112 |
1.87 1.00 |
1.21-2.89 Ref. |
0.005 Ref. |
Caucasian (detail) |
74
(6)
(65
-
) |
Screening: MMSE
AD Diagnosis: DSM IV, NINCDS ADRDA (detail) |
A, E, G, APOE4, HCY, CRT, SH, VTB‡ |
|
Ravaglia, 2005
|
Wang, 2001
|
Kungsholmen Project
|
Incidence study reporting hazard ratios (HRs) |
370
(81%) |
3.0 y |
≤10 nmol/L: 15% >10 nmol/L: 85% (detail) |
12 47 Total: 59 |
1.70 1.00 |
0.90-3.20 Ref. |
0.1 Ref. * |
15 62 Total: 77 |
1.60 1.00 |
0.90-2.90 Ref. |
0.12 Ref. * |
Caucasian (detail) |
-
(-)
(75
-
) |
AD Diagnosis: DSM IIIR (detail) |
A, E, G‡ |
|
Wang, 2001
|
Wang, 2001
|
Kungsholmen Project
|
Incidence study reporting hazard ratios (HRs) |
370
(81%) |
3.0 y |
≤12 nmol/L: 28% >12 nmol/L: 72% (detail) |
22 37 Total: 59 |
1.60 1.00 |
0.90-2.70 Ref. |
0.09 Ref. * |
28 49 Total: 77 |
1.50 1.00 |
0.90-2.40 Ref. |
0.11 Ref. * |
Caucasian (detail) |
-
(-)
(75
-
) |
AD Diagnosis: DSM IIIR (detail) |
A, E, G‡ |
|
Wang, 2001
|
* Derived value.
‡ Covariates: "A" (age), "E" (education), "G" (gender), "APOE4" (APOE e4 genotype), "PA" (physical activity), "HCY" (plasma homocysteine), "CRT" (serum creatinine), "SH" (stroke history), "VARS" (vascular risk score), "VTB" (vitamin B12)
|
|
Table 11:
Serum folate (continuous, per decreasing ordinal category)
|
Notes |
These studies evaluated serum folate concentrations in relation to AD risk. Quantiles of serum folate concentrations were analyzed as a continuous variable.
|
|
|
Alzheimer Disease |
Total Dementia |
|
Paper |
Cohort |
Study Type |
# Subjects
(% Female) |
Average Follow-up Time |
nmol/L
Mean (SD) (Range)
|
# of Cases |
Effect Size |
95% CI |
P-value |
# of Cases |
Effect Size |
95% CI |
P-value |
Ethnicity |
Age at Start of Follow-up:
Mean (SD) (Range) |
Diagnostic Assessment |
Covariates & Analysis |
Comment |
Paper |
Kim, 2008
|
Older adults in Kwangju, South Korea
|
Cohort study reporting odds ratios (ORs) |
518
(57%) |
2.4 y |
24.9
(13)
(7.8
-
88.4) (detail) |
34 |
1.32 |
1.00-1.75 |
0.05 * |
45 |
1.41 |
1.08-1.82 |
0.01 * |
Korean
|
72
(5)
(65
-
) |
Screening: CDR, MMSE, Neuropsych Testing, Other
AD Diagnosis: NINCDS ADRDA (detail) |
A, E, G, ALC, bsln wt, DEP, DISAB, PA, CRT, SM, VITS, VARS‡ (detail) |
|
Kim, 2008
|
* Derived value.
‡ Covariates: "A" (age), "E" (education), "G" (gender), "ALC" (alcohol intake), "bsln wt" (baseline body weight), "DEP" (depression), "DISAB" (disability), "PA" (physical activity), "CRT" (serum creatinine), "SM" (smoking status), "VITS" (supplemental vitamin intake), "VARS" (vascular risk score)
|
|
Table 12:
Serum folate (continuous, per 1 nmol/L increase)
|
Notes |
These studies evaluated plasma or serum folate concentrations in relation to AD risk. The resulting effect estimate is the relative risk of AD corresponding to a 1 nmol/L increase in serum folate concentration.
|
|
|
Alzheimer Disease |
Total Dementia |
|
Paper |
Cohort |
Study Type |
# Subjects
(% Female) |
Average Follow-up Time |
nmol/L
Mean (SD) (Range)
|
# of Cases |
Effect Size |
95% CI |
P-value |
# of Cases |
Effect Size |
95% CI |
P-value |
Ethnicity |
Age at Start of Follow-up:
Mean (SD) (Range) |
Diagnostic Assessment |
Covariates & Analysis |
Comment |
Paper |
Hooshmand, 2010
|
NKP-FINMONICA-CAIDE
|
Cohort study reporting odds ratios (ORs) |
271
(65%) |
7.4 y |
7.2
(4)
(
-
) (detail) |
17 |
1.03 |
0.91-1.16 |
0.63 * |
|
|
|
|
Caucasian (detail) |
71
(4)
(
-
) |
Screening: MMSE
AD Diagnosis: NINCDS ADRDA (detail) |
A, E, G, APOE4, MMSE, BMI, DBP, FUT, SM, SH, SBP‡ (detail) |
|
Hooshmand, 2010
|
* Derived value.
‡ Covariates: "A" (age), "E" (education), "G" (gender), "APOE4" (APOE e4 genotype), "MMSE" (baseline MMSE), "BMI" (body mass index), "DBP" (diastolic blood pressure), "FUT" (follow up time), "SM" (smoking status), "SH" (stroke history), "SBP" (systolic blood pressure)
|
|
Table 13:
Serum vitamin B12 (categorical)
|
Notes |
These studies evaluated serum vitamin B12 concentrations in relation to AD risk.
|
|
|
Alzheimer Disease |
Total Dementia |
|
Paper |
Cohort |
Study Type |
# Subjects
(% Female) |
Average Follow-up Time |
Exposure Distribution
|
# of Cases |
Effect Size |
95% CI |
P-value |
# of Cases |
Effect Size |
95% CI |
P-value |
Ethnicity |
Age at Start of Follow-up:
Mean (SD) (Range) |
Diagnostic Assessment |
Covariates & Analysis |
Comment |
Paper |
Ravaglia, 2005
|
CSBA
|
Incidence study reporting hazard ratios (HRs) |
816
(53%) |
3.8 y |
Below median (≤251 pmol/L): 50% Above median (>251 pmol/L): 50% (detail) |
- - Total: 70 |
0.66 1.00 |
0.40-1.09 Ref. |
0.1 Ref. |
- - Total: 112 |
0.83 1.00 |
0.56-1.24 Ref. |
0.37 Ref. |
Caucasian (detail) |
74
(6)
(65
-
) |
Screening: MMSE
AD Diagnosis: DSM IV, NINCDS ADRDA (detail) |
A, E, G, APOE4, HCY, CRT, SH, VTB‡ |
|
Ravaglia, 2005
|
Wang, 2001
|
Kungsholmen Project
|
Incidence study reporting hazard ratios (HRs) |
370
(81%) |
3.0 y |
≤150 pmol/L: 16% >150 pmol/L: 84% (detail) |
14 46 Total: 60 |
1.60 1.00 |
0.90-2.80 Ref. |
0.1 Ref. * |
15 63 Total: 78 |
1.30 1.00 |
0.70-2.30 Ref. |
0.39 Ref. * |
Caucasian (detail) |
-
(-)
(75
-
) |
AD Diagnosis: DSM IIIR (detail) |
A, E, G‡ |
|
Wang, 2001
|
Wang, 2001
|
Kungsholmen Project
|
Incidence study reporting hazard ratios (HRs) |
370
(81%) |
3.0 y |
≤250 pmol/L: 47% >250 pmol/L: 53% (detail) |
37 23 Total: 60 |
1.80 1.00 |
1.00-3.00 Ref. |
0.04 Ref. * |
42 36 Total: 78 |
0.30 1.00 |
0.80-2.10 Ref. |
0.29 Ref. * |
Caucasian (detail) |
-
(-)
(75
-
) |
AD Diagnosis: DSM IIIR (detail) |
A, E, G‡ |
|
Wang, 2001
|
* Derived value.
‡ Covariates: "A" (age), "E" (education), "G" (gender), "APOE4" (APOE e4 genotype), "HCY" (plasma homocysteine), "CRT" (serum creatinine), "SH" (stroke history), "VTB" (vitamin B12)
|
|
Table 14:
Serum vitamin B12 (continuous, per decreasing ordinal category)
|
Notes |
These studies evaluated serum vitamin B12 concentrations in relation to AD risk. Quantiles of serum folate concentrations were analyzed as a continuous variable.
|
|
|
Alzheimer Disease |
Total Dementia |
|
Paper |
Cohort |
Study Type |
# Subjects
(% Female) |
Average Follow-up Time |
pmol/L
Mean (SD) (Range)
|
# of Cases |
Effect Size |
95% CI |
P-value |
# of Cases |
Effect Size |
95% CI |
P-value |
Ethnicity |
Age at Start of Follow-up:
Mean (SD) (Range) |
Diagnostic Assessment |
Covariates & Analysis |
Comment |
Paper |
Kim, 2008
|
Older adults in Kwangju, South Korea
|
Cohort study reporting odds ratios (ORs) |
518
(57%) |
2.4 y |
380.7
(149)
(104
-
1334) (detail) |
34 |
0.93 |
0.71-1.21 |
0.59 * |
45 |
1.06 |
0.83-1.34 |
0.63 * |
Korean
|
-
(-)
(65
-
) |
Screening: CDR, MMSE, Neuropsych Testing, Other
AD Diagnosis: NINCDS ADRDA (detail) |
A, E, G, ALC, bsln wt, DEP, DISAB, PA, CRT, SM, VITS, VARS‡ (detail) |
|
Kim, 2008
|
* Derived value.
‡ Covariates: "A" (age), "E" (education), "G" (gender), "ALC" (alcohol intake), "bsln wt" (baseline body weight), "DEP" (depression), "DISAB" (disability), "PA" (physical activity), "CRT" (serum creatinine), "SM" (smoking status), "VITS" (supplemental vitamin intake), "VARS" (vascular risk score)
|
|
Table 15:
Plasma holotranscobalamin (categorical)
|
Notes |
These studies evaluated plasma holotranscobalamin concentrations (the active form of vitamin B12) in relation to AD risk.
|
|
|
Alzheimer Disease |
Total Dementia |
|
Paper |
Cohort |
Study Type |
# Subjects
(% Female) |
Average Follow-up Time |
Exposure Distribution
|
# of Cases |
Effect Size |
95% CI |
P-value |
# of Cases |
Effect Size |
95% CI |
P-value |
Ethnicity |
Age at Start of Follow-up:
Mean (SD) (Range) |
Diagnostic Assessment |
Covariates & Analysis |
Comment |
Paper |
Kivipelto, 2009
|
Kungsholmen Project
|
Incidence study reporting hazard ratios (HRs) |
228
(70%) |
6.7 y |
Lowest quartile: 25% Second quartile: 25% Third quartile: 25% Highest quartile: 25% (detail) |
22 16 8 15 Total: 61 |
1.00 0.81 0.38 0.82 |
Ref. 0.39-1.69 0.15-0.94 0.36-1.87 |
Ref. 0.58 0.04 0.65 |
27 21 14 21 Total: 83 |
1.00 0.85 0.47 0.85 |
Ref. 0.45-1.61 0.23-0.96 0.43-1.67 |
Ref. 0.63 0.04 0.64 |
Caucasian (detail) |
81
(5)
(75
-
93) |
Screening: DSM IIIR - dementia
AD Diagnosis: DSM IIIR (detail) |
A, E, G, albumin, APOE4, MMSE, BMI, HGB, HCY, CRT, FOL‡ (detail) |
|
Kivipelto, 2009
|
‡ Covariates: "A" (age), "E" (education), "G" (gender), "albumin" (albumin), "APOE4" (APOE e4 genotype), "MMSE" (baseline MMSE), "BMI" (body mass index), "HGB" (hemoglobin), "HCY" (plasma homocysteine), "CRT" (serum creatinine), "FOL" (serum folate)
|
|
Table 16:
Plasma or serum holotranscobalamin (continuous, per 5 pmol/L increase)
|
Notes |
These studies evaluated plasma or serum holotranscobalamin concentrations in relation to AD risk. The resulting effect estimate is the relative risk of AD corresponding to a 5 pmol/L increase in plasma or serum holotranscobalamin concentration.
|
|
|
Alzheimer Disease |
Total Dementia |
|
Paper |
Cohort |
Study Type |
# Subjects
(% Female) |
Average Follow-up Time |
pmol/L
Mean (SD) (Range)
|
# of Cases |
Effect Size |
95% CI |
P-value |
# of Cases |
Effect Size |
95% CI |
P-value |
Ethnicity |
Age at Start of Follow-up:
Mean (SD) (Range) |
Diagnostic Assessment |
Covariates & Analysis |
Comment |
Paper |
Hooshmand, 2010
|
NKP-FINMONICA-CAIDE
|
Cohort study reporting odds ratios (ORs) |
271
(65%) |
7.4 y |
Serum
91.3
(50)
(
-
) (detail) |
17 |
0.90 * |
0.83-0.99 * |
0.02 * |
|
|
|
|
Caucasian (detail) |
71
(4)
(
-
) |
Screening: MMSE
AD Diagnosis: NINCDS ADRDA (detail) |
A, E, G, APOE4, MMSE, BMI, DBP, FUT, SM, SH, SBP‡ (detail) |
|
Hooshmand, 2010
|
Kivipelto, 2009
|
Kungsholmen Project
|
Incidence study reporting hazard ratios (HRs) |
228
(70%) |
6.7 y |
Plasma
105
(88)
(18
-
685) (detail) |
83 |
1.00 * |
0.98-1.03 * |
0.99 * |
130 |
1.00 * |
0.98-1.03 * |
0.99 * |
Caucasian (detail) |
81
(5)
(75
-
93) |
Screening: DSM IIIR - dementia
AD Diagnosis: DSM IIIR (detail) |
A, E, G‡ (detail) |
|
Kivipelto, 2009
|
* Derived value.
‡ Covariates: "A" (age), "E" (education), "G" (gender), "APOE4" (APOE e4 genotype), "MMSE" (baseline MMSE), "BMI" (body mass index), "DBP" (diastolic blood pressure), "FUT" (follow up time), "SM" (smoking status), "SH" (stroke history), "SBP" (systolic blood pressure)
|